Author's Notes

The Nearest Animal

  • images
  • method
  • worldbuilding
  • craft

The peoples in this record who are not human each have a body worked out from their world and written down in plain words. A Cerebraun has no head and no front. It rests low on four short, broad lower limbs and works with four longer upper ones, which end blunt and carry small eyes along their length.

Every picture of it I asked for came back as an octopus.

The nearest animal

An image generator learns from photographs, and every photograph is of life on Earth. Asked for a soft body with eight limbs and a skin that changes colour, it finds the one Earth animal with all three and draws that. Asked for a low armoured body on jointed legs, it draws a beetle, a tortoise or a crab. Asked to make the Cerebraun stand properly on its lower limbs, it drew an elephant. It draws the nearest animal it has seen, because those are the only animals it has seen.

Once I saw that, I saw it in pictures I had already accepted: Chthonari that read as beetles, a Meridian that reads as a woodlouse, a Serephine like a crab with wings. I had been holding new pictures to a bar the old ones never cleared.

So the test changed. A picture fails if it simply is a recognisable Earth animal, or two stitched together, or has a face where the design has none. An echo of an Earth form is allowed when the body is the people's own. The record already says that a likeness belongs to whoever sees it: a human eye will find an octopus in a Cerebraun whatever I do. The picture should let that impression fire and then fail on inspection.

What worked, and what did not

Better words worked for about half the peoples. For the rest, a second round of better words drew the same animals again.

Showing the generator a people's filed portrait, with a sentence saying it carried the body and nothing else, worked at once for two peoples whose words had failed twice. A picture holds a body in a way a sentence cannot.

Editing an existing portrait kept its body faithfully, flaws included: a beetle stayed a beetle, and a slumped Cerebraun stayed slumped until I asked it to stand, when it became the elephant.

What finally worked was to stop describing the body and build it.

A grey model first

I built the Cerebraun as a plain grey model in Blender, a free 3D program, from the written design and nothing else: a low headless mass on four broad supports, two working limbs either side of a small sealed capsule, one raised above it, eyes along each limb. It looks like putty, which does not matter, because it is not the picture. It is the shape.

Then I gave the render to the generator with one instruction: make this a photograph and keep every shape where it is. It added skin, light, a stone room and a camera's grain, and left the body as built. All four attempts kept the design, which no text prompt had done for this people in two weeks.

That is now Vaurel's portrait. The skin still looks a little like plasticine, too smooth and too evenly lit, and a later pass will fix the light and the grain. The flaw is in the finish. The body is right, and the body was the part I could not get any other way.

That order of priorities follows from what the pictures are for. This is an illustrated story, not a visual novel. The story is carried in words, and the pictures stand beside it as plates stand in an old natural history, judged first by whether they agree with the text.

A generator of our own, trained to know these bodies, is not practical, and would be trained on the very pictures that carry the pull. The better division is the one the model gives: the generator supplies the look of a photograph, and the shape comes from a design it cannot bend, written from a world before any picture was asked for.

Better than a mask

Film and television have long shown aliens as an actor in a rubber mask: a human face with a ridge across the forehead. It is the generator's failure from the other side. Both borrow a body the audience already knows and decorate it.

A plasticine finish on a body built to its design is still far better than that. One is a flaw of finish. The other is a flaw of conception, and conception is what a record like this one exists to get right.

Postscript, 27 October 2026. This was more hopeful than the following day bore out. A grey model holds a shape; it does not hold a reading, and the nearest animal moved rather than went away. A second pass on Vaurel, with a teaching surface and a doorway for scale and one hard light, took four rounds, and each round's model made a failure of its own: four upper limbs laid side by side became fingers on a slab, a tall body seen low became a crouching headless torso, and a raised limb that only touched the body came back lying on it. The fourth round is the portrait now. For the Ilveth the same route failed outright. Show the segments and the paired limbs their design gives them and the model is a caterpillar; hide them, as the first portrait did, and the body is a slug; raise the vanes and it is a sail-backed lizard. Nothing from it was used. So the grey model is one tool among several, good for proportion, scale and light, and no answer to the nearest animal on its own. Where there is an answer, it is still in the design: a silhouette that carries something no Earth animal has.

Discussion

Show discussion

Comments are read after they are posted and anything unsuitable is removed. Posting needs a GitHub account; reading needs nothing.