General Maren Solveig Krast (Human, Military Space Command)
- Time
- 2719 UCSD, Eleventh Week of Testimony
- Location
- Solar Command, Mars — Outer Stations Consolidation Hearing Chamber
Eleven weeks in, and the hearing chamber had stopped feeling like a chamber and started feeling like weather — something you dressed for rather than attended. Krast had given testimony to enough review boards across thirty years of service to recognise the particular fatigue of a room that had asked the same question in nine different phrasings and was preparing to ask it a tenth time.
The delegate from whichever outer station had the floor this session — Krast had stopped tracking which one, not from disrespect but from a simple ceiling on how much a person could hold in working memory across eleven weeks — had just finished reciting response-time figures for a supply emergency the MSC's committee structure had taken four months to authorise action on. Four months. Krast did not dispute the figure. She had reviewed the underlying file herself before testimony began, and it was accurate, and accuracy was not the same as refutation, whatever the delegate's tone implied it should be.
"General Krast," the hearing chair said, "the chair would ask you to respond directly, if you're able, to the pattern Delegate Solano has just described. Not the single incident. The pattern."
She was able. That was, in its way, the entire problem with the next several minutes: she was entirely able to answer honestly, and honesty was going to cost her something she had not yet finished calculating.
"I'll answer the pattern," Krast said. "The MSC's committee structure is slow. I'm not going to stand here across eleven weeks of testimony and tell this hearing that isn't true, because the record already shows it's true, and a general who argues with her own record in front of people who've read it is not defending the institution, she's insulting the hearing's intelligence." She let that land before continuing, because the room needed to hear that she was not here to dispute facts, only to dispute what the facts were supposed to mean. "What I will defend is why the structure is built slow, deliberately, rather than fast by accident. This body keeps convening this same hearing, generation after generation, as though speed were a value with no cost attached to it. I never saw the Coherence Wars. Nobody in this chamber did, and I have never taken that to be a disqualification — I was taught them at Solar Command by officers who were taught by the men who ended them, and the figures do not change in the handing over. Forty years. Three billion dead. Every one of those deaths came from institutions that could move fast — faster than the MSC ever has, faster than this hearing would ever authorise anything to move today."
"General—"
"I'm not finished, and I'd ask the chair's patience for one more sentence, because I think it's the only sentence in eleven weeks that's actually said what I believe rather than what I've been defending by inference." She had not planned the sentence in advance. She would spend a long time afterward being unable to decide whether that made it more honest or less forgivable. "We tried democracy. The result was forty years of the Coherence Wars and three billion dead. I would rather be called a tyrant than repeat the experiment."
The chamber did the thing chambers do when a sentence lands wrong for the room and right for the speaker: it went very quiet in a way that had nothing to do with agreement.
Krast did not, in that moment, feel she had said anything except what thirty years of service had actually taught her. She would go on believing that for a long time afterward, in the specific way people go on believing the thing that requires them not to examine too closely why nobody else in the room seemed to be believing it with her.
Discussion
Show discussion
Comments are read after they are posted and anything unsuitable is removed. Posting needs a GitHub account; reading needs nothing.